| |
|

|
|
|
Interdisciplinary
Streams
Session 3
May 4, 14:00-18:00
|
|
|
5 simultaneous Interdisciplinary
Streams
Innovation
as Risk Taking
Knowledge
based Risk Management
Values
and Spirituality
Cross-Cultural
Competence
Creative
Leadership
|
.
|
Innovation
as Risk Taking
Session
3,
May 4, afternoon
|
How
to resolve the tension between the need for all parts of the organisation
to innovate and the different attitudes to risk that reside there?
Failure-to-innovate is essentially a management-failure ... but can
managers innovate? Can top managers take risks? What is their role
in innovation? The innovating-organisation must organise-to-innovate
... How do organisations structure to accomodate
risk-taking? What social innovation is required?
Mick
Yates, Founder,
LeaderValues Ltd.
Leadership, risk and
global innovation
Innovation is all about leadership – and
leadership cannot happen in a vacuum. It demands balancing operational
needs with organizational needs, and it demands being able to successfully
handle paradox, complexity and, in the end, risk. In today’s globally
competitive marketplace, innovators must look well beyond their borders.
Understanding patterns of leadership and innovation from other parts
of the world can thus be extremely helpful to all businesses.
Mark
Minevich,
Co-Chair, BTM Institute, Chief Strategy Officer, Enamics, Inc.
Global Outsourcing and Global Innovation
fueling Growth
Tomorrow's leaders and creators can no longer rely on yesterday's
business notions. Today, the real power lies in the hands of those
who are not bound by borders, time zones or hierarchical structures.
We need to enable change, innovation and risk taking in an ever increasing
"world of rule by quarterly results" by discovering and
identifying the next wave of winning management practices. How can
globalization and technology be harnessed to redefine creativity in
an era that puts compliance above innovation?
|
Moderator
|
Oebele
Bruinsma,
Founder & Partner, Synmind bv
|
.
|
Knowledge
based Risk Management
Session
3,
May 4, afternoon
|
What
are the disciplines that specifically address risk and uncertainty?
... actuarial
sciences, contract law, evidence based decision making, strategic
management, project management, program management, portfolio management,
.... How widely are they applied in specific categories of risk? and
what is their scope of application? How will this change in the future?
How will they evolve ... What new disciplines will emerge? Will old
ones applied in new ways? Will the scope of application expand?
Kalle
Kähkönen, Chief Research Scientist, Technical Research
Centre of Finland, (VTT)
Fundamental Enablers
for Wide-Scope Risk and Opportunity Management
We are still pioneering in the area of
project risk management. The discipline of project risk management
is under continuous development and it is only gradually finding its
role and position within other managerial work.
This presentation shall provide
a discussion on the main body of risk and opportunity management pinpointing
several shortcomings and proposing improvements. In particular, localised
risk and opportunity definitions, holistic paradigm for wide-scope
risk and opportunity management together with the core process where
focus is on risk and opportunity identification are presented as new
contributions.
Mike
Taylor, UK Managing Director, Evalueserve
Global Risk Management by using Data Analytics
and Business Research
Global market and product risks represent a large part of today’s
companies’ total risk exposure. Ever shorter product development cycles
and an increasingly global competitive environment require continuous
monitoring of markets, products and technologies. Quickly changing
customer behaviours and shorter product lifecycles force companies
to react ever more quickly to competitive threats. A good example
of this is how Skype’s P2P VoiP solutions revolutionized the global
telecom markets. By using advanced analytics of company-internal data
and external market dynamics, companies can significantly reduce their
exposure.
|
Moderator
|
Simon
Jones,
Director, HCS, University of Amsterdam,
former
Managing Director, M.I.T. Media Lab Europe
|
.
|
Values
and Spirituality
Session
3,
May 4, afternoon
|
Why
do human beings resort so quickly to armed conflict when it is so
clear that no one really wins wars? Why do we refuse to adapt dialogue
and reconciliation as means to resolving conflict in spite of evidence
that it works and wars don't? Why is there such widespread public
legitimacy for outmoded ways of thinking about leadership and the
future? Are human beings ready to leap into a new
consciousness, a more mature stage in our evolution, and
become "global patriots"? There
is no doubt that we have the ability to make this leap. The question:
will we choose to?
John
Renesch, Author, Getting to the Better Future: A
Matter of Conscious Choosing
Conscious Living, Conscious
Work: Becoming Global Patriots
San Francisco-based author John Renesch
points to the opportunity facing humankind to consciously evolve to
a new and unprecedented level of maturity, and create a just, sustainable
and compassionate world. By adopting a new worldview, human beings
can take advantage of the extraordinary possibilities that are inherent
in what he refers to as "a communion of technology with spirit," or
co-creation. This option has never before been available in human
history and, if recognized and acted upon, can launch us into a new
era of maturity, wisdom and consciousness.
Bill
Liao,
Senior Partner & Director, openBC / CEO Finaxis AG
Reputation Risk - how to survive networking
in the digital age
Reputation is closely linked to your system of values ...
Manging risk to your reputation involves
- identifying your values ...
- communicating them clearly and
- making sure to reflect them in your actions ...
|
Moderator
|
Jonathan
Marks,
Director, Critical Distance BV
|
.
|
Cross-Cultural
Competence
Session
3,
May 4, afternoon
|
The
cohabitation of peoples through commerce and collaboration
in a global marketplace exposes us to the cultural component of risk
as well as the relativity of need. One person's desire for sustainability
is opposed by another one's desire for material growth. The management
of risk across cultural boundaries needs to link different views of
the future, of the good gamble, the just reward, the allocation of
responsibility, the distribution
of hazard and equitable access to opportunity. How does
this structure our partnerships and alliances? What competencies are
required to make this work?
Finn
Drouet Majlergaard, Founder & Managing Partner,
Gugin
Cross-cultural competence
- a key success factor in a globalised world
In a world of rapid change, the success factors for companies will
inevitably change as well. The "American way" of thinking is no longer
universal. Strong Asian economies require holistic thinking and new
ways of organising our corporations. As goods and services become
commoditised local norms and values become more important. Being close
to local cultures with diversified organisational structures and systems
might be the key to success in the future - but are we ready to change?
Tom
Lambert,
Founder, Global Chairman, International Centre for Consulting Excellence
[ ICfCE]
Advisory Board, Club of Amsterdam
Never the Twain?
Many countries have traditionally sent some of their best and brightest
young people to the USA and Europe to complete their management education.
Shackled by curricula largely designed to meet local needs these graduates
have returned with models, tools and techniques that can be close
to impossible to apply within the culture. The ICfCE is operating
Think Tanks designed to combine the best of Eastern and Western understanding
in a way that is sensitive to local cultures and needs. Understanding
of a culture demands knowledge of a country's history, religion, philosophy,
belief systems and present needs that can only come from being a national
of that country - or does it?
|
Moderator
|
Hans
Hoogeweegen, Executive Vice President, Medical Knowledge
Institute
|
.
|
Creative
Leadership
Session
3,
May
4, afternoon
|
Societies
change and social needs evolve. We try to understand these changes
with reference to paradigms such as the litigious society, the information
society, the blame society, the knowledge society, the risk society.
Societies need leaders and their demands of leaders
evolve too. Models of leadership include not only visionary
and representational leadership but forms of leadership that are collaborative,
generative and collective.
Until now the relationship between the leader and the lead has seldom
been a mature one. Leaders are parts of a system. They cannot be all-knowing,
they cannot work alone and their leadership may be short-lived. What
kind of leadership is required by societies that have re-learned how
to live and prosper with risk?
Peter
Merry, Evolutionary Change Facilitator,
Partner, Engage! InterAct,
Co-Director, Center for Human Emergence (Netherlands)
Evolutionary Leadership : creativity for emergence
At this time when the old systems are proving inadequate to new problems
and the new solutions have not emerged yet, a particular kind of leadership
is being called for. Letting go, letting come; sitting in the chaos
and paying attention to signs of new order; insight into the interconnectedness
of all things and compassion for all life. What are the new maps that
help us to make sense of the emerging landscape? And who are we being
called to become?
George
Pór, Founder,
CommunityIntelligence Ltd.
Collective Intelligence and Collective Leadership
Galloping complexity and the deepening global interdependence
of our organizational and societal challenges, created an unprecedented
demand for boosting collective intelligence (CI) at every level. Organizations
can succeed only if they learn to upgrade and mobilize their collective
intelligence. CI is the capacity of human communities to evolve towards
higher order complexity and integration through collaboration and
innovation. Upgrading current organizational CI to "CI 2.0" will result
in new forms of collective leadership, such as leadership councils
and leadership communities of practice.
|
Co-Moderators
|
Erika
Stern,
Utrecht School of Governance
|
.
|
| |