|
|
.Knowledge
Process Offshoring |
Published by Evalueserve
Knowledge Process Offshoring (KPO) A Win-Win
Situation
Executive Summary
Indian KPO sector, with revenues of 0.72 billion in 2003, accounted
for 56% of the global KPO sector. According to Evalueserve, share
of Indian KPO sector is expected to increase to 71% of the Global
KPO sector, with revenues of USD 12 billion, by 2010.
Evalueserve estimates that the Indian KPO market is expected to
grow at a CAGR of 49.5 percent between 2003 and 2010, compared to
a CAGR of 30.6 percent for Indian BPO market, and a CAGR of 44.5
percent for global KPO market over the same period.
The service sector accounted for 51 percent of Indias GDP
in 2003, much higher than 28 percent in 1950 and also one of the
highest among the developing economies. Evalueserve estimates that
the share of service sector is expected to rise to 57 percent in
2010 and the phenomenal growth of IT software and services sector
has remained one of the major components of the Indian service sector
growth.
Outsourcing of high-end jobs is a win-win situation for both the
end client and the KPO vendor. Evalueserve analysis shows a positive
change in the cost structure of the clients (cost-cutting of as
much as 40-70 percent) due to outsourcing of jobs to low- cost destinations
like India.
India with its large
pool of chartered accountants, doctors, MBAs, lawyers and research
analysts, is expected to dominate the KPO sector along with the
BPO sector. In fact, Indias edge in providing KPO services
will help it stay way ahead of other low-cost outsourcing destinations
in the global outsourcing market.
There are immense opportunities
in high-end KPO for Indian firms. The potential high-end opportunities
are in the areas, such as pharmaceuticals, investment banking, market
research and competitive intelligence, bioinformatics, data search,
integration and management.
The full report can be downloaded as
a *.pdf
click
here
|
|
|
.Energy
LAB |
LAB
on Old and New ENERGY
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
April 17 & 18, 2007
Location:
Girona
near Barcelona, Spain
Max. 20 Delegates
Early
Bird registration till
March 9th!
Please
use our
Energy LAB Registration at
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/contentevents/lab_registration_001energy.htm
Moderated by
Humberto Schwab,
Director, Club of Amsterdam, Innovation
Philosopher
Read
also
Innovation
- a hybrid connection between old practices?
and the Thought Leaders
Nathalie
Horbach, Centre for Energy, Petroleum
and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee
Read also
Q&A
with Nathalie Horbach about the future of Nuclear Energy
Simon
Taylor, Director
and Co-Founder,
Global Witness
Read also
Q&A
with Simon Taylor about Climate and Energy Provision
Christof
van Agt, International Energy
Agency
Paul
Holister, Nanotechnology & Energy
Read also
Q&A
with Paul Holister about Nanotechnology & Energy
|
|
|
.News
about the future of the Global Workplace |
|
|
|
|
|
Building
a Global Workplace Community
By Stephen M. Paskoff,
Esq., President, ELI
Many multinational firms are struggling with a kind of identity crisis:
How do we create one global workplace community out of all of these
various and culturally distinct workplaces? Moreover, what do we expect
of the members of that global community in terms of how they treat
one another and conduct their business? When an employee in one region
can send an inappropriate or culturally offensive e-mail to people
around the world with one click, finding an answer to these questions
is becoming more and more of a business necessity. Corporate culture
and people issues take on new complexities when the workplace
spans multiple countries and regions.
read
|
|
|
GLOBAL
WORKPLACE
|
|
|
International
Trends in Workplace Safety and Health
The general trend throughout industrialized
nations is a sharing and cooperation of research and legislation.
The US, EU, UK, Australia, Japan, Korea, Finland and Canada, all recognized
leaders in occupational health and safety, are using information technology
to share this information across borders. This is seen in the buildup
of content-rich national websites conveniently linked for ease of
use by employers throughout the world. The EU has a research agenda,
which puts it in the lead for research-based information on Occupational
safety and health.
|
|
|
|
|
.Club
of Amsterdam blog |
|
|
Club
of Amsterdam blog
http://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com
Subscribe
in a reader
March
05:
Q&A
with Simon Taylor about Climate and Energy Provision
February
27:
Q&A
with Nathalie Horbach about the future of Nuclear Energy
February 21:
Q&A
with Paul Holister about Nanotechnology & Energy
February 12:
Innovation
- a hybrid connection between old practices?
|
|
|
|
.News
about the Future |
|
|
|
|
|
Holographic
images use shimmer to show cellular response to anticancer drug
The response of tumors
to anticancer drugs has been observed in real-time 3-D images using
technology developed at Purdue University.The new digital holographic
imaging system uses a laser and a charged couple device, or CCD, the
same microchip used in household digital cameras, to see inside tumor
cells. The device also may have applications in drug development and
medical imaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D
in sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa must improve its scientific and technological capacity
if it is to boost social and economic development. According to UNESCO,
there is less than one scientist or engineer for every ten thousand
people in Africa - compared with two to five per thousand in Europe
and the United States. But experts disagree on how to improve this
capacity. Some suggest investing in select institutes as centres of
excellence; others argue that efforts should focus on strengthening
existing infrastructure. Some think policymakers should support capabilities
within individual firms, while many believe that informal research
and development activities, or cross-sector networks, best encourage
industrialisation.
|
|
|
|
.The
Future of Chinas Economy The Path to 2020 |
|
|
Rohit Talwar
is a global futurist, entrepreneur, researcher and specialist advisor.
|
The Report
China has experienced an unparalleled transformation in just 30
years since opening up the economy. Now the world's fourth largest
economy, over 400 million have been taken out of poverty and it
has become the world's leading consumer of commodities such as steel
and aluminium. China is on course to quadruple the size of its economy
from $1trillion in 2000 to $4 trillion by 2012. Forecasts suggest
it could overtake the USA, Japan and Germany to become the world's
largest economy as early as 2035. The middle class is expected to
exceed 500 million within ten years.
Against this backdrop
of breathtaking statistics, how is the rest of the world reacting,
how are businesses viewing the China market and what are their expectations
of China's global impact in the period to 2020?
To help address these
questions, Rohit Talwar has undertaken a major global business survey
on the future of China's Economy in which over 700 respondents from
60 countries across five continents provided detailed responses.
This represents the first global study of its kind on such a scale
- providing rich quantitative and qualitative insights into how
attitudes and ambitions for the China market are evolving across
continents.
The Findings
The report provides a truly global perspective on how businesses
around the world see China developing and the impact it will have
on their organisations. It highlights how different regions around
the world vary in their outlooks, strategies and tactics for the
China market. The study explores the impact people expect to see
China having on everything from currency markets and investment
flows through to product standards and promotion prospects for managers
in multinational corporations.
The report highlights
how concerns and expectations differ between those operating in
China and those looking in from outside. It takes a long term-perspective
the proportion of firms' staff, revenues and profits that will be
accounted for by the China market and explores the potential for
others to follow the lead of IBM's procurement business in relocating
their headquarters to China. The report also provides clear comparisons
on how attitudes and expectations differ across business sectors
and professions. Finally, the report highlights a number of critical
questions for firms' currently planning or evaluating their China
strategies.
|
75% Pre-Launch
Discount Offer for the Club of Amsterdam's Network
Rohit Talwar - the report's author has generously offered the
Club's Network a pre-launch discount of over 75% on the price
for his forthcoming report on the Future of China's Economy. The
report will be priced at US$395 at its launch on March 22nd. Our
Network can order a copy at the discounted price of just US $95+postage
and packing.
To order your copy, please go to www.aptn.org/Events/regchina.htm
Or telephone +44 (0)20 7272 6766 and quote discount code CLAM01
|
|
.Next
Season Event |
|
|
the
future of the
Gobal Workplace
Thursday,
March 29, 2007
Registration: 18:30-19:00, Conference: 19:00-21:15
Where: PricewaterhouseCoopers, Thomas R. Malthusstraat 5, 1066 JR
Amsterdam
Tickets
for € 30, € 20 [discount] or € 10 [students]
With
Mandar Apte,
Business
Strategy - Competitive Intelligence Analyst, Shell Global Solutions
International B.V.
Workplace of the future - scenarios and trends - Views of a global
citizen
Andrew Kruseman Aretz,
Partner, Human Resource Services,
PricewaterhouseCoopers Belastingadviseurs N.V.
Changing demographics of people flows around
the World
Jean-Claude Knebeler,
Director of Foreign Trade, Ministry of the Economy and Foreign Trade,
Luxembourg
Does off-shoring
hold the key to success, especially for SME's?
Moderated by Hedda Pahlson-Moller, Managing
Director, Omnisource International,
Benelux Client Executive for Evalueserve
Supporters
|
|
|
|
|
.Recommended
Book |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Global Workplace: International and Comparative Employment Law - Cases
and Materials
by Roger Blanpain, Susan Bisom-Rapp, William
R. Corbett, Hilary K. Josephs, Michael J. Zimmer
With the forces of globalization as a backdrop, this pathbreaking
casebook develops labor and employment law in the context of the national
laws of nine countries important to the global economy -- U.S., Canada,
Mexico, U.K., Germany, France, China, Japan and India. National materials
are contextualized by coverage of international labor standards promulgated
by the International Labor Organization, as well as the principles
that emerge from two regional trade arrangements -- the North American
Free Trade Agreement and the European Union -- and TNC's self-regulatory
efforts. Instructor resources include an extensive teachers' manual,
powerpoint slides, and a website providing updates in this broad and
fast-moving subject.
|
|
.Q&A
with Nathalie Horbach about the future of Nuclear Energy |
|
|
Nathalie Horbach,
Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University
of Dundee |
Club of Amsterdam: Nathalie - you teach at the Centre for Energy,
Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy at the University of Dundee
and you follow the policies of nuclear energy at national and international
level. There seems to be on one side a growing pro nuclear energy
mood in Europe and on the other side a country like Germany follows
a clear exit strategy. How is Europe going to deal with this situation?
Europe leaves its member-states
the option to choose which course they prefer to follow. However,
it now explicitly recognizes the "necessity" of including
nuclear energy in the energy mix, for reasons of security of supply
and diversification of energy sources, and emission constraints.
Due to liberalisation, increased competition and European integration
of national energy markets, it seems that such an accommodating
approach is both justified and effective. It leaves those member-states,
such as France or Finland, with a vested interest and political
support to ensure the necessary nuclear share within Europe, while
others, such as Germany, may pursue other options in respect of
renewables (wind) thereby adequately responding to public pressure.
In this way, joint investments in and further development of nuclear
energy will be channeled to dynamic and secure markets, which allow
also for channeling of safeguards, security and safety activities
in order to further improve and ensure safe, reliable and sensible
use of nuclear energy in the future. However, due to potential risks
involved in nuclear activities, it is important to improve transparency
and fair competition (especially in safety and technology) worldwide
instead of merely regional, while preventing protectionist approaches.
Club of Amsterdam: Can
you explain how nuclear energy relates to environmental issues?
What role is it going to play in context of sustainable energy sources
like wind energy etc.?
Nuclear energy provides for a credible alternative source of
electricity. It does not emit CO2 although, similar to renewable
energy sources, emissions are not entirely zero. Due to the need
to mitigate recognized risks, nuclear energy has the most secured
and innovative energy fuel cycle, in respect of both strict international
and national safety and liability regulation (polluter-pays), including
internalization of such costs in the electricity price.
It is for that reason
that it can be considered to be increasingly 'sustainable'. However,
there remains the issue of waste, which includes also an intergenerational
aspect, that could be both negative (imposing a potential 'radioactive'
inheritance) and positive (potentiality of an essential future energy
source in view of new technological reprocessing developments),
even though not imposing society with unconfined and uncontrollable
emissions. In addition, proliferation and terrorism risks continues
to be a source of concern, resulting in political reservations with
respect to nuclear energy. Nonetheless, nuclear energy seems in
the mid- to long term to be a 'sensible choice' in view of all available
options. It is a credible and necessary alternative, especially
in combination with renewable sources of energy, to reduce carbon
fuel dependency both to respond to climate change and environmental
concerns as well as insecurities inherent (and recently increasing)
in the global energy supply market.
As such, the policy
to no longer exclude nuclear energy as an option and even to increase
reliance on nuclear power, could play an important mid-term role.
On the one hand, it attracts further investment into developing
safer and environmental neutral forms of generating nuclear electricity.
Such is currently the focus of joint efforts in respect of nuclear
fusion and 'new generation' nuclear facilities, which are constructed
to be inherently safe, highly economical, proliferation resistant
and produce minimal waste. On the other hand, it ensures an adequate
electricity supply in the middle long-term, while reducing usage
of carbon fuel as part of a global policy, and thus allows in the
meantime increasing efforts and investments in further maturing
other energy sources (wind, solar, etc.) in order to shift to a
potential better sustainable option in the long-term.
Club of Amsterdam: What do you expect from
a dialogue between "old and new energy"?
It is important to accumulate all fresh, innovative and diverging
views, ideas and experience into a solid and new energy dialogue
in order to extract important elements for a comprehensive and reality
driven energy policy for the future. Often discussions in this field
are constructed around narrow and obsolete premises, leaving aside
a great potential that might result from a wider and more comprehensive
approach based on an innovative method of guiding and channeling
thoughts within a more 'philosophical' environment. This dialogue
could encourage such a focus in search of consensus on new parameters,
essential requirements and contemporary guiding principles appropriate
to be incorporated in the preparation of future (European and other
international) energy policies or strategies.
Thank you Nathalie!
Nathalie is a Thought
Leader in the
LAB
on Old and New ENERGY
|
|
.Media
LAB |
LAB
on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May
29 & 30, 2007
Location:
Girona,
Spain
Max. 20 Delegates
Early
Bird registration till
March 16, 2007
Please use our
Media
LAB Registration at
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/contentevents/lab_registration_002media.htm
Moderated by Humberto
Schwab, Director, Club of Amsterdam,
Innovation
Philosopher.
With the Thought Leaders
Laurence
Desarzens, urban
communicator, beatmap.com, Paul
F.M.J. Verschure, ICREA research
professor, Technology Department, University Pompeu Fabra,
Ricardo Baeza-Yates,
Director, Yahoo! Research, Rudy
de Waele, Founder,
M-trends.org
www.clubofamsterdam.com
|
|
|
.Q&A
with Simon Taylor about Climate and Energy Provision |
|
|
Simon
Taylor, Director
and Co-Founder,
Global
Witness |
Club of Amsterdam:
Simon, you are a Director and Co-Founder of Global Witness, an
organisation that exposes the corrupt exploitation of natural resources
- amongst them oil and gas. What are your long-term strategies and
how do plan to implement them?
In 1993 together with
two others, Charmian Gooch and Patrick Alley, I set up Global Witness
to expose the corrupt exploitation of natural resources and international
trade systems, to drive campaigns that end impunity, resource-linked
conflict, and human rights and environmental abuses.
Half of Global Witness
work involves the compilation of first hand evidence and information
about the situation on the ground in areas of conflict and instability
through conducting investigations, field visits, and standard research.
Such information is then compiled into hard-hitting reports which
are subsequently taken to all key policy makers to ensure change.
Half of our work is accurate information gathering the other
half strategically using such information to drive positive change.
Right now, the existing
modalities for natural resource extraction do not work. Details
of such arrangements are usually shrouded in secrecy, and the provision
of concessions almost always, certainly in the developing world,
involves major corruption. Usually also in our experience, it is
very hard to see the benefits being accrued to the country and its
population rather, the population is usually on the receiving
end of a litany of abuse, a degradation of quality of life, and
very often conflict. Such conditions tend to prevail for the masses,
whilst a small elite benefit on a vast scale through the wholesale
asset-stripping of state assets and the passing of the proceeds
through the international banking system, with no questions asked.
So, in summary, the
existing international architecture which governs the roles of companies
taking advantage of such conditions requires a major overhaul. Right
now, shareholders, influential mafia-style middlemen, international
banks, and elites within natural resource-exporting countries benefit
on a massive scale, at the direct expense of their populations.
You could even say that the populations of these countries subsidise
these profits with their livelihoods, and very often
with their lives.
Global Witness has
been exposing key examples of such business practices and the systems
by which business activities operate for over a decade. We have
been the key initiator of a number of international processes, including
the Kimberley Process to combat conflict or blood diamonds, the
Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), which came about
as a UK Government response to the launching of the Publish What
You Pay Campaign (PWYP), and the FLEG initiatives to address illegal
logging. These processes are far from complete. In addition, we
urgently require additional changes to this international trade
and business architecture, otherwise companies and individuals will
continue conduct business in areas of conflict and instability,
without any accountability over the impact of their actions on local
populations.
Global Witness will
continue to expose examples of bad business in any and all sectors
which influence instability and conflict and which destroy serious
efforts at development in such countries. Coming out of this work
will be further deliverable strategies to address these issues.
Club of Amsterdam: "Publish What You Pay" - conceived
and co-launched by Global Witness - is a campaign that aims to help
citizens of resource-rich developing countries hold their governments
accountable for the management of revenues from the oil, gas and
mining industries. Can you describe its impact?
Publish What You Pay
(PWYP) was launched to demand mandatory revenue disclosure from
companies in the oil and gas, and mining sectors. Other sectors
may be included later. This was because many such companies had
been, and continue to be, involved in sleazy deals with producer
country elites. These company activities have included the running
of slush funds in tax havens for the purpose of bribery or delivery
of favours, outright bribery, the payments of vast sums
into personal accounts and even the payment for and delivery of
weapons into conflict zones via company subsidiaries that do not
officially exist. We have even come across a system where a major
prominent international oil company deliberately rigged the debt
of a producer country, such that it completely controlled the entire
economy of the country of course, to its favour. Of course,
the other half of this coin is the role of elites in resource exporting
countries who, as described above benefit from such activities.
Before launching PWYP
in 2002, Global Witness had already been involved in a 2 ½
year discussion with some of the more enlightened oil and gas companies
to create the conditions for these companies to disclosure their
payment data on a voluntary basis. In early 2001, BP announced that
it intended to disclose such data in Angola only to be faced
with contract termination and being thrown out of the country. The
circumstances around this incident ultimately demonstrated the limits
to which oil companies, even if they wanted to, could go. Ultimately,
going it alone would be disastrous for any company not only
this, but those companies which were fundamentally part of the problem
had no intention of following such an example, and would be left
to pick up contracts at the expense of the good companies.
Such a voluntary process was thus completely inoperable!
The launch of PWYP
quite rapidly created a reaction from the UK Government, which launched
the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), which brings
together producer and consumer governments, a large percentage of
the global key oil, gas and mining companies (there is a need to
attract more of them), and civil society. The initiative is based
on the premise that countries would volunteer to disclose the revenue
streams they obtain from the extraction and export of oil and gas
and mining products. Once a country steps up to the mark, all companies
would be then be obliged to disclose the payments they make for
the extraction of the resources in their concessions. This way,
comparison can be made between what companies say they pay, and
what countries say they receive. Any discrepancy could then be independently
assessed, with civil society being intimately involved in the process.
The result would be a level of disclosure of the vast rents which
accrue as a consequence of natural resource extraction (in particular,
oil and gas) which hitherto has not been available. This would create
an absolute minimum, but vitally important, first step towards creating
accountable governance over such revenues in order that they might
actually benefit the citizens of the countries concerned.
There are various areas
of concern with these arrangements thus far. The most important
of these is that it remains very hard to imagine the likes of President
dos Santos of Angola, or President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea (there
are many others who could be added to this list) actually volunteering
their countries to implement EITI. The elites who call the shots
in both these countries are amongst the pre-eminent kleptocrats
in the world today, and they have no interest in being held accountable
for the expenditure of their States revenues, which are currently
making them very rich. Having said that, there is some delivery
coming from EITI due to the significant implementation of EITI by
Nigeria and Azerbaijan both places where it would have been
hard to believe this was possible only a short while ago. These
are significant steps forward, but it is important to understand
that this is a work in progress and we need to see where the initiative
goes over the next year to year and half, whilst also continuing
with efforts to deliver mandatory disclosure mechanisms in a variety
of jurisdictions.
PWYP is now a coalition
of 300+ civil society organizations across all continents of the
world. It is an extremely effective and efficient coalition and
is represented on the International Advisory board of EITI, such
that civil society plays a key role in the evolution and delivery
of EITI. The PWYP coalition is intimately involved in a global push
to deliver parallel mandatory solutions to revenue transparency,
premised on the idea that we need to see accountability over the
management of resource revenues by both the elites who control the
expenditure, and the companies who do the paying. The consequence
of this global engagement is that the idea of revenue transparency
in all countries for natural resource extraction has moved from
an issue where we were initially laughed at by company and government
officials as being unrealistic, to a situation today where it is
in the mainstream, and where the key largest oil, gas and mining
companies, together with an array of producer and consumer countries
have agreed to the delivery of revenue transparency. We now need
to keep up the pressure and see where this process goes.
Club of Amsterdam: The way we use energy and we treat the environment
are closely connected. What do you expect from a dialogue between
"old and new energy" and more specifically: What role
should nuclear energy play?
We are rapidly heading
to a global crunch-time regarding the provision and utilisation
of energy. This crunch primarily relates to two major
global crises, which if not addressed are likely to precipitate
a vast array of additional crises, seriously threatening any future
prosperity, let alone the prospect of significant development across
the worlds least developed countries. I am referring here
to the nexus of the climate and energy provision crises each
in their own right seemingly vast imponderable problems, but which
when taken together create a problem the scale of which humanity
has not yet experienced.
We are familiar with
many of the serious implications of impending climate change, and
so I will not go into any detail here. However, thus far the political
response to this situation is massively inadequate to the task.
We see political posturing, and at best now at least the clarion
call for action on the basis that this is a serious matter for humanity
to address. But then, almost in the same breath, the solutions
put forward are so inadequate that one might be tempted to laugh,
if the implications were not so serious.
Simultaneously, and
neatly compartmentalised into another section of governments
thinking, we also hear the call for energy security. Whilst it is
of course obvious from any states perspective, to secure stable
supplies of essential energy, it is clear that for the main part
such calls relate to securing ever more supplies of oil and gas
the very things we should be avoiding if we wish to slow
down and ultimately prevent dangerous climate change. The consequence
of this shallow thinking is that the entire global energy provision
system of financial, diplomatic and corporate operations remains
geared to business as usual.
As if this was not
bad enough from a climate change point of view, we are rapidly heading
towards (if we have not got there already!) a peak in global conventional
oil production. Gas is not too far behind. The consequence of global
conventional oil peaking is not that we run out of oil oil
will still be available for a long time to come. What it does mean
once this peak in output is reached is that global oil production
will no longer be able to match demand. Furthermore, the lines on
any graph of production versus demand are likely to separate very
quickly. All this leads ultimately, and within very few years, into
very dangerous territory: At best it will completely undermine the
global governance agenda, leading to the end of such initiatives
as EITI, with companies and governments rushing to the bottom to
outbid one another in a downward spiral of dirty deals. At worst,
within very few years after a peak of oil output, we face the prospect
of global powers nuclear armed powers - facing off against
each other in an increasingly aggressive posture for essential energy
resources.
Following on from the
climate crisis disaster, political thinking around the provision
of energy represents a second massive abrogation of responsibility
by our political leadership. Given the pre-eminent role oil plays
right across the global economy, it is not just the prospect of
military confrontation we should be worried about. Indeed the economic
implications could be a disaster on the scale of 1929 all over again.
There are of course
no easy solutions to this situation. However, what is clearly required
is the kind of global leadership and international cooperation on
the scale we have seldom seen in the past. The output needs to be
nothing short of a global revolution around the way in which we
generate and utilize energy and its subsequent equitable availability.
Nothing less will suffice. Whilst this might sound dismissive, nuclear
power would seem to be an unnecessary distraction which does nothing
to address either our overall energy requirements, or the overall
use of carbon intensive energy sources and that is before
we consider the implications of the complete lack of adequate waste
management, the propensity for increased nuclear use to create its
own security of supply problem, the appalling overall record of
the industry when it comes to onsite safety and maintenance, and
the increased risks of nuclear proliferation and the potential for
terrorism.
In terms of the dialogue,
I would hope we can discuss some of these issues further during
the
LAB
on Old and New ENERGY.
Thank you Simon!
|
|
.Agenda |
|
Tickets
for Seasons Events:
€ 30,
€
20
[discount] or
€
10
[students]
Our Season Events for 2006/2007 are on Thursdays:
|
the
future of Global Workplace
March
29, 2007, 18:30 - 21:15
the future of Success
April 26,
2007, 18:30 - 21:15
the future of Tourism
May 31,
2007, 18:30 - 21:15
Taste
of Diversity
June 28, 2007, 18:30 - 21:15
|
|
|
LABs in Girona
near Barcelona, Spain, moderated by Humberto
Schwab:
LAB
on Old and New ENERGY
April 17 & 18, 2007
Early
Bird registration till
March 9th!
Please
use the
Energy LAB Registration
LAB
on MEDIA and Human Experience
May
29 & 30, 2007
Early
Bird registration till
March 16, 2007
Please
use the
Media
LAB Registration
|
...
|
|
|
|
.Club
of Amsterdam Open Business Club |
|
|
Club
of Amsterdam Open Business Club
Are you interested in networking, sharing visions,
ideas about your future, the future of your industry, society, discussing
issues, which are relevant for yourself as well as for the 'global'
community? The future starts now - join our
online platform
...:
http://www.openbc.com/go/invuid/Felix_Bopp2
CIWI
- Creative Minds Worldwide
CIWI
Club of Amsterdam Forum
|
|
|
|
.Contact |
Your
comments, ideas, articles are welcome!
Please write to Felix Bopp, Editor-in-Chief:
editor@clubofamsterdam.com
|
|
.Subscribe
& Unsubscribe |
Subscription
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/subscription.htm
To unsubscribe:
http://www.ymlp.com/unsubscribe.php?ClubofAmsterdamJournal
|
|
m |
|